A RUNNER ON 2B IS NOT IN SCORING POSITION IN BASEBALL5

(And Coaching Like They Are Is Costing You Games)

Most Baseball5 coaches still coach like they’re playing baseball.

That’s not a stylistic problem.
That’s a competitive liability.

One of the most damaging carryovers from traditional baseball thinking is this idea:

“A runner on second base is in scoring position.”

In Baseball5, that idea is flat-out wrong.

And if you build your offense around it, you’re optimizing for a situation that barely produces runs.


Why this assumption survives (even though it shouldn’t)

The field looks like baseball.
The bases look familiar.
The terminology sounds the same.

So coaches assume the value of base runners transfers one-to-one.

It doesn’t.

Baseball5 is a constraint-heavy game:

  • No bat
  • No pitcher
  • No catcher
  • No outfield
  • No stolen bases
  • Very limited extra-base hits

Those constraints radically change which base states are actually dangerous.

If you don’t rethink base value, you’re just roleplaying baseball in a different uniform.


Buy the book “A RUNNER ON 2B IS NOT IN SCORING POSITION… AND WHY YOU SHOULD CARE”

The uncomfortable truth

In Baseball5, most runs are not scored from second base.

They’re scored from third base.

And the gap between those two situations is massive.

A runner on second base:

  • Cannot score on a routine ground ball
  • Rarely advances without defensive errors
  • Often becomes dead weight if you burn outs trying to “move them over”

A runner on third base:

  • Scores on almost anything
  • Forces defensive panic
  • Breaks standard force-play logic

Treating second base like a scoring position causes two predictable coaching mistakes:

  1. Wasting outs to “advance” runners
  2. Misreading risk when deciding whether to stretch plays

Both are fixable. Neither is obvious if you’re still thinking baseball.


A simple scenario that exposes the problem

Situation:

  • 0 outs
  • Runner on 1B
  • You’re thinking: “Let’s just move them into scoring position.”

So you:

  • Bunt
  • Soft-hit
  • Sacrifice
  • Or force a low-upside advance

Result:

  • You traded an out for a runner on 2B
  • You feel productive
  • You’re not

What you actually did:

  • Reduced your margin for error
  • Failed to create real run pressure
  • Delayed the only base that truly matters

Second base is not the goal.
Third base is.

And getting to third base efficiently requires a completely different offensive mindset.


Why this matters more than you think

Baseball5 innings are short.
Outs are brutal.
Double plays are rare—but momentum swings aren’t.

Every out you give away chasing the illusion of scoring position is an out you don’t get back.

The best Baseball5 teams don’t ask:

“How do we advance the runner?”

They ask:

“How do we avoid wasting outs until the situation is actually dangerous?”

That difference shows up on the scoreboard.


What I’m not explaining here (on purpose)

I’m not showing:

  • Which base states actually produce runs
  • When advancing is worth the risk
  • How this changes hitting direction choices
  • How defensive positioning should respond
  • How opponent quality skews these probabilities

That’s the work.

And that’s where most coaches stop thinking.


Final thought (read this twice)

If your offensive plan treats second base like a finish line, you’re coaching scared.

Baseball5 rewards pressure, not tradition.

If you want the full framework—when advancing runners makes sense, when it’s a trap, and how this single idea reshapes hitting, baserunning, and defense—that’s exactly what my book “A RUNNER ON 2B IS NOT IN SCORING POSITION…AND WHY YOU SHOULD CARE” will give you.

This post is just the crack in the wall.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *